The dangers of flash

Damage to my couch

 

Did you know that camera flash produces enough heat in a single discharge to leave burn marks on your couch? I found that out last night while testing my wireless triggers with my new Canon 580 EX II. My wife is not happy with me right now:)

 

Comments

Only $9,995 - let me get two and a happy meal

Mamiya - only 9,995

Comments

Another camera saved

I recently finished restoring a half-a-century old Kodak Tourist camera that I bought on eBay for $10 bucks.  The bellows needed a bit of work and the shutter had to be cleaned, but after a few days of work I got everything working.  Unfortunately, I did not realize that Kodak Tourist cameras take 620 film which is no longer manufactured.  Fortunately, a local camera repair shop had a couple of 620 spindles.  I found a tutorial online on winding 120 medium format film onto 620 spindles and after about 10 minutes with a film bag I loaded my new old toy with a fresh roll of Kodak Tri-X. 

Unfortunately I don`t have a film scanner, so I had to scan the negatives on a regular flatbed.  The negatives look beautiful and the scans don`t do them justice.

Kodak Tourist, Kodak Tri-X 120

Comments

New life for a Canonet

A few days ago I finished restoring a Canon Canonet QL17 GIII Rangefinder that I bought at a flea market for $10.  The easy part was replacing all the light seals that turned to black goo with age.  The hard part was fixing a stuck leaf shutter.  I had to take two precision screwdrivers, a pen and a bit of duck tape to make a spanner wrench needed to take the lens apart.  In the end, it took me a little over a week to put everything back together.  Even though I took photos of every step as I was taking the camera apart, I still kept ending up with a few extra parts.  Finally, I think on the fourth try, I got everything looking and working exactly the way it was supposed to and took the camera out for a spin.

The lab kind of screwed up and printed the roll instead of scanning it; I had to scan the paper prints, so the quality is not that great.

Canon Canonet QL17 GIII Test photo roll

Canon Canonet QL17 GIII Test photo roll

Canon Canonet QL17 GIII Test photo roll

 

Canon Canonet QL17 GIII Test photo roll

Comments

Film photography and creativity

I would like to start this article with a disclaimer.  I love digital photography and as a professional wedding photographer find digital workflow much much much better for my business than film workflow ever was or ever will be.  However, even though 99.9% of my work is done with digital cameras, Adobe Lightroom and Adobe Photoshop, I still love working with film for my personal projects.  Please do not misconstrue this article as an invitation to start yet another film vs. digital argument or as an advice to hawk your digital equipment on eBay and start stocking up on film.  This article is simply my opinion – nothing more, nothing less.  If I come off as a snob, I apologize.

 

 

In the last 5 years digital cameras became both affordable and ubiquitous.  Even 90-year-old grandmothers I see at weddings are sporting sleek and shiny Canon and Sony point-and-shoot digicams.  Advances in digital photography gave even the laziest of us the ability to produce acceptable snapshots.  The downside of this trend is that there are fewer and fewer people who actually have any desire to learn photography.  At every wedding I have photographed in the past few years I see at least 3 or 4 guests brandishing entry-level Nikons and Canons, crouching down in church isles and unexpectedly popping up in my viewfinder at the most critical moments.  For the most part, they think of themselves as serious photographers sneer at the other guests who are not as well-photographically equipped.  These newly-minted photographers who think that aperture is a type of operetta (I kid you not) never bother learning even the basics of photography and their cameras are perpetually stuck in the “Auto” mode. 

 

Once in a while, on very rare occasions, I would see among the guests an old man who refuses to part with his venerable Pentax Spotmatic, or a young kid who found a beat-up Nikkormat in his grandfather`s attic.  They diligently check the aperture and shutter speed settings after every shot, they spend 30 seconds meticulously focusing their lenses and lining up their subjects in the viewfinder.  They are dinosaurs in this digital age and other guests point at them and snicker.  I, on the other hand, want to come up to them and shake their hands.

 

In the days clunky metal camera bodies and lenses that were able to stop a bullet you had to earn the right to use your camera.  If you decided to spend money on an SLR, you had better learned the intricacies of exposure and the tricks of pre-focusing your camera.  You might not have become the world’s best photographer, but at least you had to learn something.

 

Modern cameras take learning out of the equation.  That’s not necessarily a bad thing if you are a busy mom wanting to take snapshots of your toddler.  However, this trend is finding its way into places where high-quality photography has always been an absolute must.  I see newspapers and news sites that publish cell phone-quality photographs and I just want to cry.  10 years ago a photographer would be tarred and feathered for even submitting such a crappy photograph to illustrate a story. Today, for the sake of saving money, a blurry cell phone photograph has become an acceptable alternative.

 

I love digital photography.  In the olden days, I charged my clients separately for film and processing and I always had to be very careful how much I shoot.  Now, I can walk away from a wedding with over 2000 shots and not worry about the cost – only the shots that make the cut will actually be printed.

 

The one downside of digital photography, at least for me, is that it made me lazy and sloppy.  With film I had to be super careful about exposure – I used external light meters for formal shots, I bracketed like crazy, I had to be certain to get at least one photograph where everyone has their eyes open.  With a digital SLR, I can shoot in RAW format and as long as I don’t blow out my highlights, I can be off the mark by as much as 2 stops and still recover a decent (if grainy) image. 

 

I miss film.  I love film.  I have over 500 rolls of 35mm film stocked in my refrigerator.  I have about 20 film cameras lying around the house, at least 10 of them in working condition.  I miss my Hasselblad and kick myself for selling it a few years ago.  I miss my Nikon F3 – the first high-end camera I bought after I immigrated to the United States.  In 1996, I paid $1300.00 for this beautiful machine, and it served me well for 6 years, before dying a horrible death in a rock climbing accident. 

 

Whenever I feel burned out, whenever 60 hours a week in front of a computer and two back-to-back weddings leech all the creativity out of me, I put away my laptop and my digital SLRs, grab one of my 20-year-old Zenits, Pentaxes, or Nikons and go for a walk around the city. 

 

Nothing seems to clear my mind like the feel of clunky metal camera body in my hand, the click of the shutter and the sound of the winding mechanism pulling on film’s sprocket holes.

 

I keep hearing news about Kodak, Fuji, Agfa and other film manufacturers discontinuing certain types of film.  I understand that film is no longer commercially viable and that in a few years only artists will be using it.  I also realize that in a few years whatever film is still manufactured will be prohibitively expensive.  That is why everyone who reads this article should send me a roll of film.

 

Comments

Hare Krishna

I was walking from work a few days ago when I saw a bunch of people dancing down Forbes Avenue in Oakland, singing the Hare Krishna mantra.

Comments

TLC Photoshoot
Well, my break is finally coming to it`s end. Winter months are always pretty slow as far as photography goes - very few people want to get married when it`s below zero outside. Usually I do get an odd photography job here and there between December and March. This year, given the fact that I recently bought a house and that my wife is 6 months pregnant, I decided to take a break from photography and concentrate on my family. A few days ago I got a call from John Earnest, a client of mine from back when I ran Kronos Media Arts (a company that unfortunately no longer exists). While with Kronos, I designed and coded John`s company`s website (www.teamlaminates.com). In the last year John has been so busy that he never had a chance to finish writing content, so the website never went live. He called me and asked me if I could help him finish this long-overdue project. I stopped by his shop and took some environmental portraits of his employees and a photo of a new cool computer-driven machine that cuts wood into shapes provided by CAD designs.
Comments

Experiments with a Holga
If you are a photographer and you have never held a Holga, you are definitely missing out. I am not going to write about this piece of "wonderplastic" - if you are interested, check out an article on Wikipedia or visit the Lomographic International Society website Unfortunately I do not have a medium format film scanner, so I had to scan the following slides on a flatbed scanner.
Comments

An Almost Perfect Travel Camera
As a professional photographer, I care a lot about the quality of my photographs. Because of that obsession I have always lugged heavy bags laden with SLRs, lenses, flashes and other accessories on my trips and vacations. A few months ago my wife and I went on a short vacation to New England. After hours of hiking with a backpack on my back and two SLRs (a Canon 20D with a 70-200 f/4 L lens and a 40D with a 17-40 L lens) my back was killing me to the point where I was sorely tempted to leave everything under a tree and hike back to the car. Granted, lugging all that equipment paid off and I brought back some really wonderful and memorable photographs. On the other hand, my vacation turned into just another working weekend and my enjoyment from the trip was greatly diminished by all the extra weight on my back and shoulders. Once I came back to Pittsburgh, I swore that never again will I lug 30 pounds of photo equipment on a vacation. Thus, my search for the perfect travel camera had began. I spent hours on dpreview.com and photographyreview.com reading people’s opinions of various advanced point-and-shoot cameras. I emailed every professional photographer that I know and asked them what camera’s they take on their vacations. Several of my photographer friends swore by Leica M8 as the perfect travel camera, but the $5000 price tag is a bit too taxing for my wallet. So, after much deliberation, I picked up two cameras – a Canon Powershot S5 IS and a Canon Powershot G9. At first, I was totally in love with the G9 – it’s size and weight were perfect for travel and the retro styling of the body just looked cool. The fact that it could shoot RAW was also a big plus. However, after playing with it for a couple of days I became very disappointed with the images. At low ISO the images were wonderful, very much on par with my SLRs and Canon L-series lenses. Alas, if I set the ISO to 400 or higher, the images became so noisy that they were virtually unusable. I thought that maybe I got stuck with a defective camera, but as it turned out many photographers complained of the same problem. With a heavy heart I put the camera back into it’s original box and took it back to the store. I don’t know what possessed Canon to stuff 12 megapixels into G9’s tiny sensor. If they stuck with 8 megapixels of G7, G9’s predecessor, it would have been so much easier to control the noise at high ISOs. Canon Powershot S5 ended up being a keeper, although it’s nothing to write home about. The image quality is very decent, but far from stellar. The super-zoom lens is nice as an all-around travel lens, but there is a considerable amount of purple fringing at the telephoto end. Also, the images are very soft past 200mm. The fact that the S5 is powered by AA batteries is also a big drawback. Regular AA don’t last very long – maybe about 50 shots. Rechargeable metal nickel hydrate batteries last for about 100-150 shots, but considering the fact that I shoot 500-1500 images on an average travel day, I have to go through at least 4 sets of batteries that have to be recharged afterwards. Why Canon decided not to use a high-capacity battery with the S5 is beyond my understanding. If anyone from Canon, Nikon, Olympus, Pentax, Fuji, or any other camera manufacturing company comes across this post, please, I beg you, make the perfect travel camera. These are the features that I would love to see: 1. Small and light – the size of Canon Powershot S5 is perfect 2. A slightly larger sensor than 1/1.8 or 1/2.5 3. Don’t pack it with megapixels – 8 megapixels is sufficient for a travel camera 4. Image stabilization 5. Usable ISO 800 6. Faster lens – I don’t care about super-zoom, just give me a high-quality lens that would cover a 35mm equivalent of 24-105 mm Canon, if you can add these features to what’s already packed into the S5, I’ll be forever in your debt.
Comments

Megapixels vs. Megabucks
Yesterday I was sitting at the Coffee Tree in Squirrel Hill when a distinguished-looking gentleman came up to me and asked me for directions to downtown Pittsburgh. I told him the easiest was to get there and was about to say goodbye and go back to my reading when I noticed a Canon 1Ds with a 24-70 L lens on his shoulder. For those of you who are not photography geeks, such set up costs somewhere around $8500. I asked the guy if he was a photographer; to my surprise he told me that he was a tourist and that he bought this ridiculously expensive camera in hopes of producing better pictures. He complained to me that his camera was “a rip-off” because even though he spent so much money he does not see much improvement in his photographs. This guy is just one of a multitude of amateur photographers who don’t seem to realize that ninety nine times out of a hundred a photograph will only be as good as a photographer. Yes, the equipment (especially lenses) plays a big role in the quality once you get to a certain level. On the other hand, I have been shooting photographs more or less continuously for close to 20 years and I have taken some great (good enough to be published) photos with my 20-year-old Soviet-made Zenit ET and I have taken some incredibly crappy pictures with a four-thousand-dollar Hasselblad. Several years ago I went to school with a kid who was a big gadget geek and had a trust fund larger than the annual income of some small countries. One day he came to my house and showed me a bunch of pictures that looked like they were taken with a point-and-shoot camera. As it turned out, he just bought a two-thousand-dollar Nikon F5 and slapped a seventy-dollar zoom-lens on it. A great investment! A lot of my friends are professional photographers and some of them are quite good. Pretty much all of them, especially if photography is their only source of income, will shoot with the cheapest equipment they can get away with. One of my friends, who is a pretty highly sought wedding photographer, still shoots with a 15-year-old Hasselblad and a pair of Nikon 8008 bodies. He thought I was completely crazy when three years ago I dumped $1500.00 on a Canon 20D! Most people seem to be completely taken by the megapixel hype and will spend enormous amounts of money every time a manufacturer will come out with a new camera that has more megapixels. I am fairly certain that most consumers don’t even look at other qualities of the camera, such as noise control, image stabilization, or low-light performance. What people don’t realize is that a 6-megapixel Nikon D50 will outperform a 9-megapixel Fuji S9000 any day of the week in any lighting situation. Moreover, why do people need 9-megapixel point-and-shoot cameras? To print 4x6 prints? Another thing that people don’t seem to realize is that more megapixels mean larger file sizes, and larger file sizes mean higher storage requirements. I have been shooting weddings for about 10 years; for the past 3 years I have been shooting digital. In those 1o years I had only two clients who requested enlargements larger than 11x14. You can easily print a clean 11x14 from a 6-megapixel file; with an 8-megapixel camera such as a Canon 20D you’ll have more than enough room for cropping. The only reason I spent money on a Canon 5D last year was because I had several high-paying commercial jobs that required larger prints. I guess I am trying to make two points here. The first point is that consumers should educate themselves before going to a store. If you really want to learn photography and really care about image quality, get a DSLR, but don’t let the pixel count be your only criteria for your decision. Do not buy an expensive camera and put a cheap lens on it – you’d be better off with a less expensive camera body and a better lens. When traveling, don’t pack fifty pounds of camera gear – chances are you won’t lug all that stuff everywhere you go anyway, and even if you do you won’t enjoy your trip as much. Before making a decision on which camera to buy, visit wonderful websites such as dpreview.com, photo.net, and photographyreview.com. Or just run a Google search on the camera model that you are interested in (for example, Canon 40D+reviews). Educate yourself, read reviews and make your decision based on facts and on your personal needs instead of the megapixel count or the balance of your bank account. And another thing – don’t keep your camera in the camera bag; in fact, don’t bring a camera bag at all! You can catch that wonderful frame only if you have a camera in your hands.
Comments

Whats in your bag?
Since I recently wrote an article making fun of my wife’s addiction to purses as well as comparing her purses to miniature black holes, I thought it would be only fair to write about one of my own obsessions. To be honest, I would have never written this article, but I received several emails through both this blog and my photo blog (www.photo-guru.net) asking me the very question that has plagued photographers for at least a century – what camera bag to buy? I am sorry to disappoint those few who actually read my blogs – THERE IS NO PERFECT CAMERA BAG. Over the years, I have struggled with the obsession of finding the perfect bag, the one and only bag that would allow me to comfortably carry in every situation. The only thing that I achieved by this quest is a closet full of camera bags and my wife giving me weird looks every time I berate her for buying yet another purse. There is no perfect camera bag, but I can tell you what I use. My most used bag is a Domke F6 knock-off. Domke makes wonderful canvass bags that last for years, don’t really look like camera bags and can fit a surprising amount of stuff. For more information on Domke bags, check out their website, http://www.tiffen.com/products.html?tablename=domke
You can buy the cheap Chinese-made knock-offs on eBay for about $30-$50 dollars, depending on the size and quality. I bought mine 15 years ago at a yard sale and it still serves me well. This bag is my primary camera bag for almost everything – weddings, journalism work and some types of travel photography. The bag fits a Canon 5D with either a 17-40 f/4 or 24-70 f/2.8 lens attached, a Canon 40D body without a lens attached, a 70-200 f/4 lens, a 50mm f/1.4, a Zenitar 16mm f/2.8 fisheye and a Canon 580EX flash. The side pockets have enough room for another flash and a lens, batteries, cables, filters and cleaning supplies.
Another cool thing about this particular bag is that it fits perfectly inside a Timbuk2 medium messenger bag. I often do this if I have to carry my equipment for long periods of time (the bike messenger distributes the weight a lot better than a camera bag), or if I go into bad neighborhoods. Another plus of having one bag inside another is that Timbuk2 bags are weatherproof, adding one more layer of protection for expensive equipment. When I have to do commercial work, weddings, etc… and need more gear than I could fit in the Domke bag, I use two large wheeled suitcases that I bought at TJ Maxx for $50 each. I also bought Pelican foam inserts from B&H Photo and set up one suitcase to hold my studio lighting and second suitcase to carry extra photo equipment, like additional cameras, lenses and cables. This way I ended up with two excellent equipment cases for less than $200.00. My second most used camera bag, and my most used everyday bag is a Timbuk2 medium bike messenger bag. That shapeless bag is so incredibly tough that it actually saved my life once when I fell off my bike and slid about fifteen feet on my back. Timbuk2 bags are really well made, waterproof and sit comfortably on your back no matter how much stuff you stick in there. On most days, I use my Timbuk2 messenger bag to carry a MacBook laptop, a Holga camera, a Canon Powershot S5, books, notebooks, papers, etc… You can see the usual contents of my bag in the photo below.
I also made a three-compartment insert for the bag – you can buy similar inserts on B&H Photo (they are made by Domke or Tenba), but they are never quite the right size or shape (at least not for me). So with some canvas from JoAnn Fabric, some thin foam for padding and about 4 hours with a needle I made a custom insert that fits my needs. One of the dividers on the inside of the insert folds down, creating one large compartment and one small. With the insert in the bag, I can carry three lenses in the insert (or two lenses and a flash, or one lens and a DSLR with a lens attached), a laptop and a bunch of other small items.
The best part about using a messenger bag is that it does not look like a camera bag and you can get much more use out of it than from a specialized bag made by any of the known camera bag manufacturers. What’s your perfect camera bag? I don’t know and I cannot recommend one. The best way to find out is to go to a large camera retailer store, bring your gear and see what fits and what doesn’t. Oh, and don’t forget to take your camera out of the bag once in a while.
Comments

The cutthroat world of wedding business
Yesterday I happened to check the guestbook on my wedding photography website, www.photo-guru.net, and found a post from a professional photographer named Joe. This is his post verbadum:
    Dmitry, you are a disgrace to the wedding photography community. I hope you rot in hell. Your prices are a joke and as a real pro wedding photographer I know you are not making any money from what you are doing and you are just trying to fuck up the market for the rest of us. Get the fuck off the wedding business and go get a job you can handle. Your images all blow ass.
At first I did not know how to react. If the guy had the balls to leave his contact information I would happily tell him to go screw himself. On the other hand, why should I justify my prices to some asshole who is afraid of competition. Notice that he did not begin his tirade by telling me that my "images all blow ass" The quality of my images did not bother him until he actually saw my prices. Yes, my prices are way lower than the market average. Yes, I don’t make a ton of money with photography. On the other hand I don’t have a studio and only occasionally hire an assistant - not having those overhead cost I can afford to keep my prices low. In the next year I am planning on expanding my business with a friend of mine - we even talked about renting a studio space. When that happens I will definitely raise my prices to cover the costs of rent and studio lighting and all that stuff. Meanwhile, people like Joe simply need to shut up and mind their own business.
Comments

Old beaters

I have two great obsessions in life - books and cameras. When I was doing my taxes for last year and adding up all the receipts, I realized that in 2006 I spent about $400 on books and close to $9000 (that`s nine thousand) on camera equipment, printing and processing. The cost of camera equipment did not surprise me much - cameras and especially good lenses come with pretty hefty price tags. What did surprise me is the amount I spent on books.

Considering that I mostly buy used books that cost, on average, between 2 and 5 dollars, $400 is a lot of money.

However, I am getting off the subject. One of the things I love about photography is going to yard sales and thrift stores and finding old junky cameras, fixing them and actually using them to take pictures. When I went to Belarus and Ukraine in May of 2006 I ended up buying 8 old Soviet-made cameras - different models of Zenit and FED. Since normally I`m pretty busy, I`ve only gotten around to fixing some of them. The following photographs were taken with a 30-year-old FED 5. I replaced the light seal around the film door, but I guess I need to do some more work around the lens. On the bright side, the light leak did produce some rather cool effects.

 

 

Comments

Day And Night
Comments

Just plain weird
This statue? sits in the middle of the Carnegie Mellon University campus.
Comments

Experimenting With Lensbaby
If you don`t know what a Lensbaby is, check out www.lensbaby.com
Comments

My Buddy Sasha
Comments

My Evil Cat
Comments

Portrait Session With Yelena
Comments

Ground Zero
What remains of the World Trade Center as of March 14, 2007
Comments

Page 1
next »
blog comments powered by Disqus